<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Kubernetes on 老冯云数</title><link>https://vonng.com/tags/kubernetes/</link><description>Recent content in Kubernetes on 老冯云数</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>zh-cn</language><managingEditor>rh@vonng.com (冯若航)</managingEditor><webMaster>rh@vonng.com (冯若航)</webMaster><copyright>© 2025 冯若航</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vonng.com/tags/kubernetes/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>KubeSphere：开源断供背后的信任危机</title><link>https://vonng.com/cloud/kubesphere-rugpull/</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>rh@vonng.com (冯若航)</author><guid>https://vonng.com/cloud/kubesphere-rugpull/</guid><description>删除镜像跑路，这不是商业化闭源的问题，而是卡脖子断供问题，直接摧毁了社区多年积累的信任。</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://vonng.com/cloud/kubesphere-rugpull/featured.jpg"/></item><item><title>Etcd坑了多少公司？</title><link>https://vonng.com/db/bad-etcd/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>rh@vonng.com (冯若航)</author><guid>https://vonng.com/db/bad-etcd/</guid><description>因为Etcd而翻车的公司并非少数。Etcd有一个坑爹的默认设计：写满2GB数据就挂了。如果你在自己折腾Kubernetes或使用Patroni做PostgreSQL高可用，大概率会在这上面翻车。</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://vonng.com/db/bad-etcd/featured.jpg"/></item><item><title>数据库应该放入K8S里吗？</title><link>https://vonng.com/db/db-in-k8s/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>rh@vonng.com (冯若航)</author><guid>https://vonng.com/db/db-in-k8s/</guid><description>数据库是否应该放入Kubernetes里，到今天仍然是一个充满争议的话题。K8S在无状态应用管理上非常趁手，但处理有状态服务特别是数据库时有本质局限性。本文深入探讨为什么将数据库放入K8S不是明智选择。</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://vonng.com/db/db-in-k8s/featured.jpg"/></item></channel></rss>